Writing in organisations

  • Home
  • Writing Coach
  • Blog
  • Publications
  • About

The sustained effort of creating prose

21/7/2014

3 Comments

 
Thoughts provoked by “Several short sentences about writing” by Verlyn Klinkenborg

Many years ago my training persuaded me that the key to good business writing was to organise one’s thinking before starting to write. As an editor at McKinsey & Company in the 1980s, I became used to building a logical structure before starting to write any prose. 

How liberating then to read in Klinkenborg's book that the writer's job is “making sentences”. And how refreshing to come across a book about writing that does not try to sell a systematic approach to the subject. 

Here is one small example of what the author says about sentences (I could have chosen many but this one will do to show how precise and revealing his own sentences are):

We forget something fundamental as we read: 
Every sentence could have been otherwise but isn’t.
We can’t see all the decisions that led to the final shape of the sentence.
But we can see the residue of those decisions.


Klinkenborg sweeps away much conventional wisdom about writing. His book left me itching to begin my next piece of writing rather than introducing it. And I couldn’t wait to experiment with cutting down on transitional words and phrases. Readers don’t need their hand held at every step. If we write clearly enough, they will never have trouble following us, writes Klinkenborg.

Even as I write this piece now, I am experimenting (and in some cases struggling) with Klinkenborg’s ideas. For instance, I am not yet in the habit of creating each sentence in my mind before writing it down, as he recommends. Often the opening words suggest themselves to me and I then find it hard to resist touching the keyboard while I keep searching for the rest of the sentence.

Nonetheless, I feel liberated in so many ways by this unusual book. 

It has reassured me that there is no “right” subject to write about. If I start by noticing what fascinates me and then write clear, direct sentences about that, my prose stands a good chance of engaging readers. Good writing can make any subject interesting. 

And if I revise a text over and over again, I won’t necessarily edit the life out of it. On the contrary, it may come alive as I re-order words, slice out unnecessary verbiage and uproot clichés. All writing is revision, writes Klinkenborg. Making prose demands sustained effort. How reassuring.

I can even give up trying to “find my voice”. It might just emerge naturally, provided I keep composing clear, fresh sentences about things that matter to me. 

Ever since I can remember, I have loved language. Now I will devote myself to it as never before.

Related reading
Verlyn Klinkenborg. Several short sentences about writing. Vintage Books, 2013.
3 Comments
Theodore Taptiklis link
7/8/2014 06:53:58 pm

I was just reading this as I scanned the blog and it seemed such a good 'fit':
Temporality shapes Bakhtin’s concept of dialogue as well. What makes a dialogue dialogic rather than monologic, and what distinguishes dialogue from dialectic, is that dialogue does not follow any preset path. Or to use Bakhtin’s language, a dia- logue does not “unfold”, it “becomes”. Its result is not “already given” but made in the process of exchange. The same conversational starting point can always lead to multiple continuations.

The Chronotope of Humanness: Bakhtin and Dostoevsky
Gary Saul Morson

Reply
Alison Donaldson link
8/8/2014 12:21:53 am

Hi Theodore, thank you for giving this some thought. I look forward to reading Morson. Meanwhile, I find the comparison between conversation and writing helpful. Perhaps in conversation it is natural for us to formulate in our minds just the beginning words of an utterance. Then as we talk we 'discover' what we think. Or, as you say, our thinking 'becomes'. What Klinkenborg is suggesting is a deliberate habit of completing the sentence before writing it down. I think his reason is that otherwise what he calls 'volunteer sentences' are likely to offer themselves. In other words, the phrases that come to us are quite likely to include clichés. To create fresh, crisp prose, we need to work at it in our minds. I'm not completely sure yet. I still find myself writing down the opening words of a sentence, then letting the sentence 'become', and subsequently revising it.

Reply
discussion link
26/4/2016 10:32:35 am

The efforts of creating prose are very hard, especially if you revise a text over and over again... The process is quite complicated! Thank you for your article! Good luck with your write-ups!

Reply



Leave a Reply.


    ​
    If you subscribe, I'll send you an email at irregular intervals (not more than once a week) with a link to a new post. You can unsubscribe easily at any time.

    RSS Feed

    Categories

    All
    Bureaucracy
    Complexity & Emergence
    Conversation
    Literature
    Narrative In Organisational Life
    Structure & Rhetoric
    Technology & Internet
    Time & Space For Writing
    Using Writing Intelligently
    Words & Language
    Writing And Reading
    Writing & Conversation

    Blogroll

    Metis Exploration by Rob Warwick

    Rob Warwick and I also blogged for a while on developing trusting relationships.

    "Informal coalitions" by Chris Rodgers

    ​Alison Donaldson is an author and writing coach, normally based in Hove, England.
Contact